July 10th
2016. Fifteenth Sunday in ordinary time
Gospel:
LK 10:25-37
Don
Fabio’s homily follows the Gospel.
Gospel:
LK 10:25-37
There was a scholar of
the law who stood up to test him and said,
"Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?"
Jesus said to him, "What is written in the law?
How do you read it?"
He said in reply,
"You shall love the Lord, your God,
with all your heart,
with all your being,
with all your strength,
and with all your mind,
and your neighbor as yourself."
He replied to him, "You have answered correctly;
do this and you will live."
But because he wished to justify himself, he said to Jesus,
"And who is my neighbor?"
Jesus replied,
"A man fell victim to robbers
as he went down from Jerusalem to Jericho.
They stripped and beat him and went off leaving him half-dead.
A priest happened to be going down that road,
but when he saw him, he passed by on the opposite side.
Likewise a Levite came to the place,
and when he saw him, he passed by on the opposite side.
But a Samaritan traveler who came upon him
was moved with compassion at the sight.
He approached the victim,
poured oil and wine over his wounds and bandaged them.
Then he lifted him up on his own animal,
took him to an inn, and cared for him.
The next day he took out two silver coins
and gave them to the innkeeper with the instruction,
'Take care of him.
If you spend more than what I have given you,
I shall repay you on my way back.'
Which of these three, in your opinion,
was neighbor to the robbers' victim?"
He answered, "The one who treated him with mercy."
Jesus said to him, "Go and do likewise."
"Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?"
Jesus said to him, "What is written in the law?
How do you read it?"
He said in reply,
"You shall love the Lord, your God,
with all your heart,
with all your being,
with all your strength,
and with all your mind,
and your neighbor as yourself."
He replied to him, "You have answered correctly;
do this and you will live."
But because he wished to justify himself, he said to Jesus,
"And who is my neighbor?"
Jesus replied,
"A man fell victim to robbers
as he went down from Jerusalem to Jericho.
They stripped and beat him and went off leaving him half-dead.
A priest happened to be going down that road,
but when he saw him, he passed by on the opposite side.
Likewise a Levite came to the place,
and when he saw him, he passed by on the opposite side.
But a Samaritan traveler who came upon him
was moved with compassion at the sight.
He approached the victim,
poured oil and wine over his wounds and bandaged them.
Then he lifted him up on his own animal,
took him to an inn, and cared for him.
The next day he took out two silver coins
and gave them to the innkeeper with the instruction,
'Take care of him.
If you spend more than what I have given you,
I shall repay you on my way back.'
Which of these three, in your opinion,
was neighbor to the robbers' victim?"
He answered, "The one who treated him with mercy."
Jesus said to him, "Go and do likewise."
THE
GOSPEL OF THE LORD: Praise To you Lord
Jesus Christ
Kieran’s
summary . . . In this parable of the
Good Samaritan, the priest and the Levite ignore the wounded man because the
Law that they follow is fixated with their personal justification. They
represent the Law, which must stand on the side of life, and therefore they
cannot touch anything that is dead or dying. The Old Testament Law, with its
focus on personal righteousness, is unable to provide an authentic solution of
how to beave in such circumstances. What is needed is that an outsider come
along, a Samaritan, Jesus Christ, who despises his own personal justification
and righteousness and makes himself one with the unrighteous. In other words,
what is needed is love. This parable is not seeking to create an opposition
between love and law. Rather, it shows how a certain type of law is incapable of guiding our actions in the face of the
plight of others. Law that is focused on personal righteousness is very
different to law that flows from the loving concern for others. And laws do flow from love. Love is chaste and
obedient. It is generous and tenacious. It is profoundly obedient to the
condition of the other and his authentic good
What is the spiritual life all about? Having our moral
accounts square with God? Or something else altogether?
When
reading the Parable of the Good Samaritan, it is important to read the
introduction. A doctor of the Law asks Jesus what he must do to attain eternal
life. Jesus asks him what the Law teaches and the man replies: “Love the Lord
your God with all your heart, and love your neighbor as yourself”. Jesus says
that he has answered well but the man wishes to justify himself, so he goes on,
“And who is my neighbor?” This man wants to know exactly what is required for
him to have his accounts squared with God. This impulse does a lot of damage to
one’s spiritual life and results in a fixation with norms and protocols. It is
interesting to note that, in the first reading, Moses tells the people that the
task of following the Lord is not out of their reach: in fact it is something that
has been made very accessible to them so that they will be able to put it into
practice. But the Israelites immediately begin asking what exactly they can and
cannot do if they are to fulfil what the Lord wants. This is the perennial
problem that arises when we seek to be righteous by means of a system of norms.
The issue of justification has to do with one’s relationship with God.
Therefore it is a matter that is concerned with the heart, not with formulae or
prescriptions.
The Old Testament Law was incapable of providing a
solution to the kind of behaviour that was demanded by a situation of this
sort. What was needed was the coming of an outsider, a Samaritan, Jesus Christ,
who would put himself close to us and aid our afflictions with his love
In
the Parable, both a priest and a Levite see the wounded man and pass onwards.
The actions of both are determined by regulations. Neither a priest nor a
Levite was allowed to touch a corpse, and in this case we are speaking of a
victim who appears more or less dead. The fact that both were healthy men who
were capable of coming to the aid of the sick man was obscured by a fixation on
the law. The priest did not possess the solution of how to react to a victim of
this sort, and the Old Testament Law as a whole could not provide an answer to
how one should behave when confronted with such a situation. What was needed
was for someone to come who would make himself unjust for the unjust, someone
who was himself just. What was needed was the arrival of an outsider, a
Samaritan, someone who would come close to us, taking bone from our bone, flesh
from our flesh, cleansing what was dirty from our lives. Or to say it
differently: norms are good but only love can bring life. The priest saw the
sick man, but continued on. The fact that he saw entails that he made a diagnosis of the situation, but it
remained only a diagnosis. The Lord Jesus, by contrast, draws near to us,
becoming wholly immediate, leading us on the road to full healing. Laws can
help us to see how imperfect we are, but only love can help us to become
perfect.
Law and love are not in contrast to each other. Love
gives rise to its own sets of laws. The drive for personal justification gives
rise to a different set of laws altogether that have nothing to do with love.
We
are not putting love and law into opposition with each other. Laws and
regulations are important in life. In fact we see in the parable how laws are
transformed by love. The priest cannot touch the sick man because he represents
the Law and the Law must be on the side of life: it cannot touch what is dying.
The Samaritan, by contrast, utters a different kind of norm altogether: he says
to the innkeeper: “Take care of him. Whatever extra you spend on him, I will
pay upon my return”. “Take care of him” – this is the new command, a command
that has its source in love. The Samaritan is not concerned with personal
justification: he is concerned with right relations between him and others. The
justification of the priest was of the individualistic kind, but the
justification that comes from the act of love is one that is based on the care
and concern for others.
We must make the leap from one kind of norm to another
kind: from the norms that justify me to the norms that spring from love.
We
must make the transition from one type of regulation to another type of
regulation, i.e., from regulations that derive from individual justification to
regulations that spring from love. Love is chaste and obedient. It is generous
and tenacious. It is practical and finds solutions to the woes of others,
instead of being bogged down by obstacles. It is profoundly obedient to the
condition of the other and his authentic good. It has its own rules and its own
goal, which is the care of others. Justification by law has a very different
goal, which is that of personal justification. This contrast is at the heart of
the transition from the Old to the New Testaments, which is the transition from
being just to having love, and therefore having the justification and discipline
that is inseparable from love.
No comments:
Post a Comment